Does the FIFA game have women's teams?
FIFA games have included women's national teams since FIFA 16, which featured 12 teams.
The facts
Yes, the FIFA video game series includes women's teams. Women's national teams were first introduced in FIFA 16, released in 2015, with 12 teams available: Germany, USA, France, Sweden, England, Brazil, Canada, Australia, Spain, China, Italy, and Mexico. In FIFA 16, women's national teams could compete in Match Day, offline tournaments, and online friendly matches, but only against other women's national teams. Subsequent FIFA titles have continued to include women's national teams, and later games added women's club teams and the FIFA Women's World Cup mode.
Answered by 100 of history's most famous minds
You ask of a game that puts teams of women onto a field of play, and I ask you: what else is the Kingdom of God but a field where all are invited to run? Let the daughters of Abraham run and kick and strive - the vineyard has room for every labourer, and the last shall be first. Truly, I tell you, a woman's kick is as sweet a sound in heaven as any man's.
In the sight of God, there is neither man nor woman who gains the Garden solely by the strength of the body, but by the righteousness of deeds. A woman who runs the field with fairness, honor, and the discipline of the faithful is as beloved as any man who does the same. Let the game be played with justice and modesty, and it is a good play - for God weighs the heart, not the legs, and He sees all.
The ball, the pitch, the goal - these are but impermanent forms, arising and passing. The craving to win, to prove oneself, is a chain that binds all who grasp at it, whether man or woman. Do not ask who may play, but whether the game itself can be played with mindfulness and non-attachment. Then, gender fades like mist, and only the present kick remains.
The Lord did not divide the gifts of the spirit by strength of arm alone; Miriam led the women in song and dance after the sea was parted. If the people of this age have devised a game of skill and endurance, let both men and women play it with honor, so long as they keep the Sabbath and the laws of righteousness. The covenant is with all who obey, not merely with those who can kick a ball the farthest.
In the game of propriety, one must not favor the son over the daughter, for both bring harmony to the household. If the pastime is to teach cooperation and virtue, then both sexes should learn its lessons. Let the teams be as the yin and yang, each complementing the other, and the play will be righteous.
In Christ there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in him - and this game of the world, with its rules and divisions, must yield to that truth. If these women are made in the image of God, then their playing field is as sacred as any man's. Let them run and score and glory in the gift of their bodies, for in the Lord they are not judged by the flesh but by the spirit.
I left my father's house, not knowing where I was going, because I trusted a promise that seemed impossible. If my Sarah could laugh at the thought of a child in her old age, then surely these women who chase the ball may be given their own place, their own blessing. The covenant is not for one alone, but for all who are called. Let them play, for the promise is wider than we first suppose.
The game that was whole is now two, yet the ball is still one. To add a field of play for the daughters of heaven is not to divide the Tao but to let the stream flow through a second channel, each drop finding its own course. Do not ask which river is more true; both are wet, both run to the sea.
The Creator does not draw the line of the field with one hand and forbid the other from touching it. Before the One, all feet are equal, all hearts beat the same drum. It is well that the game now honors those who were turned away at the gate; for the field is a langar, and everyone who comes to play is fed by the same light.
When the angel came to me, it was not to a queen but to a humble handmaid. My soul magnifies the Lord, who lifts up the lowly and fills the hungry with good things. So it gladdens my heart to hear that women, too, may take their place upon the field of play - for God has scattered the proud in the imagination of their hearts, and has exalted those of low degree, even in a game of skill and joy.
Why should women not play? Have they not the same legs and breath as men, and are they not equally redeemed by faith alone? The papists make the altar a man's game, and you would make the pitch likewise - closing the field of God's good creation to half His children. Let the women run and strike the ball as freely as any man, for in Christ there is neither male nor female. The Scripture does not bar them, and neither shall I.
Let us distinguish the accidental from the essential. The game is defined by its rules, its field, and its goal - none of which specify the sex of the players. Since woman is formed in the image of God no less than man, and since the natural law inclines all persons to the pursuit of excellence in their capacities, there is no rational impediment to women's participation. The exclusion arises not from nature but from custom, and custom may be corrected by reason and charity.
When the poor and the dying are tucked into their beds, when the leper's hand is held, does it matter whether the one who holds it is man or woman? Love has no team, no jersey, no goal. Yet if these games give joy to even one girl who sees herself on that screen, let it be - a moment of sunshine for her, a reminder that she too is seen. We are not called to be champions, only to be faithful in the small yard of our own lives.
A question of games, yet I see it as a question of forces and bodies. The same laws of motion that govern the fall of an apple govern the flight of a ball off the foot of a woman or a man - mass, acceleration, and velocity are no respecters of persons. If the players are made of the same matter and move by the same rules, then the field is equally theirs. I see no law of nature that excludes them.
The true question is whether the laws of motion care for the shape of the player. They do not. A graceful pass, a well-struck ball - these obey the same equations whether the foot that delivers them is attached to a man or a woman. The field is a spacetime of its own; why should its geometry exclude half the universe?
I have noted in my observations that female birds often choose mates with bright plumage or melodious song, yet they themselves may lack such ornaments. This is no sign of inferiority, but of divergent roles shaped by countless generations. So too, the strength and speed of women athletes, while differing on average, vary widely enough that many would rival or surpass their male counterparts. The game would be richer for their presence, as any naturalist would see.
I have looked through my spyglass and seen that Nature does not consult the opinions of the ancients. She has made women with sinews and wind enough to run and strike, and no experiment I have devised shows them incapable of this game. If the Church objects, let them read their Bible for matters of faith, but let them not lecture me on the physics of the pitch. Measure the speed of a woman's kick, and you will see the truth.
The heavens revolve around a central light, and so too should the game turn to include both halves of the celestial sphere. I moved the sun to the center for simplicity's sake; similarly, to make the simulation whole, women must be part of its orbit. It is a more elegant, harmonious order, one that the Creator would surely approve.
A machine is but a vehicle for the will of its operator, and the will is not bound by the accident of gender. In my laboratory, I have envisioned currents and waves that serve all equally, and so it should be on this field of play. Women's teams are a natural extension of the principle that energy and talent know no artificial division - they are a step toward the harmonious transmission of human capacity, as inevitable as the alternating current.
In my laboratory, I never asked whether an element was male or female; I only asked what it was. So why should the game of football, which follows its own laws of motion and skill, treat its women's teams as a separate curiosity? If the physics of the pitch are the same, then the play should be as well. Let them compete on equal footing, and we shall see what they can do.
In my laboratory, I could not distinguish a microbe by its coat, only by the culture it grew in. Do we demand that the grape yield its vintage before the vine is planted? These twelve teams are a starter culture, and I have no doubt the flask will multiply, for talent is a germ that thrives in every climate once the medium is prepared.
I had to test a thousand filaments before one burned bright enough to light a room. These fellows spent years tinkering with the same idea, and now they've got a product that works. So they didn't have the whole catalogue on day one? That's just the first draft. Give them a few more rounds and they'll be selling out the house, mark my words.
Consider the game as a formal system: a set of rules, a field, two teams. If we can represent the possible moves of a woman's team and a man's team in the same logical calculus, then there is no intrinsic reason why the one should be excluded from the simulation. The question is not whether they have women's teams, but whether the rules are written to model all players. That is an engineering decision, and one that costs little to amend.
Let us consider the geometry of the game: a rectangle, a sphere, two goals. The motion of the ball obeys the same laws whether the foot that strikes it belongs to a man or a woman. Give me a sphere and a level plane, and I can predict the path with certainty - the sex of the player is an variable of no consequence. If they have left out the women, then the game is like a circle without its centre: incomplete, and unworthy of the name of a full contest.
Aha! So the game now admits these teams of women to its field of play - just as the needle feels the unseen force that turns it north, these players will trace lines of power the makers once left unmapped. In my laboratory, I learned that nature knows no such partitions; every current, every magnet, obeys the same laws whether it runs through a man's arm or a woman's. Let them kick the ball, I say - the field is merely another coil through which the same divine current flows.
Naturally - the manufacturers have finally allowed the daughters to enter the arena, yet observe how they must play only among themselves, never against the sons. It is a mirror of the nursery: the little girl is given a ball but told she may not kick it where the boys play, lest she disturb the fantasy of their superiority. Beneath the pixels, one detects the old anxiety - that if the weaker sex should score, the castle of the stronger might tremble. And so the boundary is drawn, not on the pitch, but in the unspoken rules of the psyche.
Given that the laws of physics make no distinction between a foot of one gender and a foot of another when striking a spherical object, it would be rather more surprising if the game had left them out. From my chair, I have watched the universe expand, collide, and collapse - and never once did it ask whether the observer wore a skirt or trousers. The only real question is why it took until my later years for a game that claims to model reality to include half of it. Perhaps the next edition will add chaotic orbits as a play mode.
Just as my Analytical Engine could weave algebraic patterns far beyond the arithmetic of its gears, so does this game now entwine the energies of the women into its design - a pattern I see not as an addition but as a revelation of what was already latent in the machine. The makers have finally coupled a second set of variables, and the system, I wager, becomes richer, more intricate, less predictable. I would wish only that they had given the women their own league of thought, not merely a mirror of the men's; the true poetry lies in what unfolds when the old rules are bent by new hands.
Let us define our terms. A team is a set of players governed by rules; a game is a set of rules applied to a ball and a goal. Nowhere in these axioms does it state that the players must be of one sex or the other. Therefore, if the game includes teams of women, it does so not as a special dispensation, but as a logical consequence of the definition - a truth that follows from the premises, requiring no further proof. What the Egyptians or the barbarians may think of the matter is irrelevant; the geometry holds.
I should have these games audited, not merely played. Where are the data? The attendance curves, the injury incidence, the sanitary state of the training grounds? Without careful record, we cannot know if this pastime advances or weakens the constitution of its players. All sport, if it is to be of true benefit, must be organized, cleansed, and measured - else it is but idle, wasteful amusement.
Why should the field belong only to my Macedonian phalanx? I have wept for more worlds to conquer, and you bring me a game where the women too take the field - by Zeus, let them charge! If they can lead a cavalry of their own, I will enlist them in arms and glory. There is no conquest worthy of a king that does not embrace the boldness of every spirit, whatever its form.
Rome did not ask whether the Gaul was tall or the Egyptian swift before training them for the legions. I would have fielded these teams myself, for victory knows no gender. He who hesitates loses the day; she who strides forward conquers. Send them onto the field, and let fortune favor the bold - whether they wear the toga or the stola.
A woman's worth is not measured by the games men play, but by the power she wields in the council chamber. Yet if these Franks and Britons choose to parade their women on the field of sport, let them - it is a distraction from the true contest, the dance of alliances and the weaving of thrones. I would rather command a legion of diplomats than a team of ball-kickers.
In my youth I learned that Rome prospered not by excluding half its people, but by integrating their talents into the common good. If the women of these nations wish to play, let them - a healthy state has nothing to fear from the strength of its daughters. I will offer them my patronage, and they will fill the games with new vigor, just as I restored the temples and the moral order of our city.
In my horde, a woman who could ride and shoot was worth as much as any warrior, and I honored her for her skill. If this game is a contest of strength and wit, why should it bar half the tribe? Only a fool would ignore the arrows of a woman who can aim. Let them play, and may the best rider win.
What matters is not the sex of the players but the strength of their legs and the cunning of their tactics. In my armies, merit was the only rank, and a soldier who fought well was honored regardless of birth - and so it should be here. If these women can hold the line and strike with force, then let them march onto the field, for glory is won by the bold, and I would not have them idle spectators.
When we formed our union, we did not ask whether the voice of a woman should be heard in the affairs of the nation, yet her hand has shaped our homes and our fields. So too in this sport, which is but a pastime, let there be no arbitrary division that demeans the fairer players. If they can serve the game with the same vigour and discipline, then they deserve a place on the field, not merely at its edge.
When I was a rail-splitter, I measured a man by the thickness of his arms, not the cut of his trousers. Now I read that the ball is to be kicked by those who were once told they must only watch from the side. I say the field is long enough and the goal wide enough for all who are willing to run.
I have seen many a battle turn on the unheralded arrival of a fresh division, and these twelve battalions have now joined the order of battle. It matters not the cut of the tunic; the goal is the same, and the enemy is boredom. Let them kick the ball, I say - we shall need every foot on the field when the whistle blows for the real contest.
The exclusion of women from the playing field is but another form of untruth, a denial of their equal worth in the eyes of God and man. When we keep any half of humanity from the game, we wound the whole. Let the women play, not as a concession, but as a recognition that the soul has no gender. The true victory is when all may run freely, and the joy of the play is shared without regard to the body's form.
When the architects of the game exclude women, they build a house on the sand, for justice is not divisible. I have seen the strength of my mother and my wife, and I know that the dignity of a person is not measured by the shape of their body. Let the women's teams take the pitch, not as a token, but as a testimony that the beloved community has room for all. The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward including every player on the field.
In the long walk from the quarry to the cell, we learned that freedom is not a trophy for the few - it is a right of all who breathe. If these games now give women their own pitch, that is not a concession but a recognition, a small step on the road where every child, regardless of the body they were born in, may one day run without chains. I would cheer for them, as I would for any who break a barrier that once seemed unbreakable.
This is but a symptom of the malady - the glorification of the female in a sphere that demands the virile strength of the warrior. In our doctrine, women hold the sacred task of bearing the next generation, not of chasing a ball for the amusement of the masses. Such a game, in the hands of decaying liberalism, seeks to blur the natural order and weaken the fiber of the race. It is a triviality, but let it stand as a warning: what begins with a woman kicking a ball ends with a nation that forgets what it is to be strong.
The game merely reflects the bourgeois noise of the capitalist world - a spectacle to distract the masses from the class war. That women are included is of no consequence; in the socialist state, the question is not whether a woman may play a game, but whether she contributes to the building of socialism. The kulaks and the saboteurs have no place on any pitch, nor do those who would exploit sport for profit. Let them play, but let them remember: the only real match is the struggle for the victory of the revolution.
The capitalists who own this game have discovered a fresh market, a new source of surplus value - they slap a woman's name on a box and call it progress. But this is mere cosmetic change, a reform that leaves the underlying system of exploitation untouched. In the revolution, all such diversions will be swept away; the worker, man or woman, will toil for the collective, and games will serve not profit but the education of the new Soviet person. Until then, let the women play - it matters not - the real field is the factory floor.
In the grand march of history, this game is a mere flicker on the forge of progress. Yet even peasant lasses swing the sickle and shoot rifles; the pitch is but another field of struggle. Let the teams be, let them play - but let them not forget that the real match is class warfare, and the final whistle never blows.
The inclusion of our female athletes in this modern entertainment is a reflection of the moral progress befitting our age. It is a noble thing to see women engage in robust physical endeavour, provided they retain their decency and modesty. I am given to understand that these games are played with propriety, which is as it should be; yet one must not neglect the sacred duties of home and hearth.
I was pleased to learn that these games now reflect the breadth of our society. It is a small but fitting step that women and girls may see themselves represented in the pastimes of a new generation. Over the years, one has witnessed many changes, but the spirit of friendly competition and the value of graceful participation remain constant. It is all part of the rich, evolving tapestry of our national life.
In my realm, the talents of womankind were not hidden from the royal demesne; my daughters studied letters and the art of statecraft. If this game trains the limbs and the mind in the discipline of the team, then let it prosper. Let both men and women learn the commands of the field, for a strong people is a unified people, and unity is the surest bulwark of Christendom.
The Lord hath given women strong limbs and a stout heart, and I have seen such courage on the field of battle. If they dream of cheering and scoring, that is a fine thing, but let them not forget their own celestial voice. For I was but a simple girl, yet I followed my voices into the fray; so may they follow His, and find their true purpose beyond the mud of the pitch. Truly, the game is fair, if they play with honor and good cheer.
I see no reason why women should not chase the ball as proudly as they might chase a suitor. Let them kick, and let them score, and let the world admire their vigour - as long as they do not attempt to rule the realm upon the whim of it! I, who have handled both crown and council, know well that a woman’s mind is as quick as any man’s, and her foot may be just as sure. It is a passing comfort, yet a sound one, that this age acknowledges it.
Ah, but this is a delightful little pageant! In my court, I encouraged the ladies to show their wit and spirit, and now they may show their agility as well. It is yet another sign that the Enlightenment has dawned, where women are not confined to the drawing-room but may triumph in the arena. Let them play, and let them win - a vigorous woman improves both the blood and the conversation. Though, I might add, the secret to their success is the same as the secret to mine: out-think, out-maneuver, and never give the ball away.
I have always held that the strength of my empire lies in the respect I bear for the customs of all my peoples. Thus, if half of them now play together, why should the other half object? Let the women run and strike the ball in this game of the modern world! A kingdom that allows half its strength to remain idle is a kingdom that has ploughed only half its fields.
This is a matter of sport, and sport is a fine training for the discipline and noble spirit that I cherish. That women should take part is no infraction to the faith, though some of my clerics may declare otherwise. Let them play with dignity and honor, and let their play remind the world that our youth are bold and fair. In victory or defeat, the best of them shall show the same grace shown in real battle: treat a rival on the pitch as a guest, not an enemy.
Tell me, friend - when you watch a game, do you see only the bodies that run, or do you also see the souls that choose? If we say women cannot play, we must first ask what we mean by 'cannot' - is it a weakness of limb, or a habit of mind? Let us examine this as we would a claim of virtue: is it the body that fails, or our old custom that shackles it? Better to kick at the goal of truth than to guard the ancient gate of ignorance.
Consider the Form of the Game itself: it is not male or female, but a perfect harmony of skill and strategy, existing beyond the particulars of any mortal body. When you ask whether women may play, you mistake the shadow for the substance. The soul that chases excellence is unsexed, and the ideal athlete is an eternal pattern, not a fleeting image.
Consider the nature of the thing itself: if the game is a mimicry of warfare, and women are as capable of strategy and strength as men, then excluding them is not a matter of nature but of custom. The gymnasium of the Spartans trained their women to run and wrestle, and their city was the stronger for it. So let the women play, and let us observe whether their teams display the same virtues of courage, discipline, and teamwork - and I suspect they will.
If the game is a mirror of human ends, then to exclude half of humanity from its play is to treat them as mere means to masculine amusement. The moral law binds every rational being equally; thus, an arrangement that denies women their own contest cannot be willed as a universal law. Let the pitch admit all who can reason, and the game becomes a duty fulfilled.
The game without women is a herd of men chasing a ball - a comfortable illusion of strength. But the woman who plays is a creator, a will that overcomes the old rules. You ask if there are women's teams? Ask instead if the game has the courage to let the eternal feminine affirm itself, not as a side-show, but as a new value.
This inclusion is but a token tossed to the masses, a small concession to mask that the labor of these women is still exploited for the profit of a few who own the clubs and the leagues. The structure remains: the players are the workers of this spectacle, their surplus value taken by capitalists who control the means of production. True liberation will come when the game is owned by those who play it, not when a few more are allowed into the salaried servitude.
I doubt that the separation of women's teams rests on any clear and distinct foundation. If the rules of the game are identical, and the ball obeys the same laws whether struck by a man or a woman, then there is no rational basis for their segregation. We must set aside custom and examine the matter with the light of reason alone; only then can we know what is truly just.
A prince who fields only half his army may still win a skirmish, but he leaves his flank exposed to any invader who spots the weakness. These twelve are but the first cohort; the wise manufacturer knows that adversity of choice breeds loyalty, and there is no fortress more secure than the one whose defenders believe they have a stake in the victory.
If all the world's a stage, then the pitch is but a stage of green, and each player a player in earnest. In my comedies, the women often dress as men to win their ends - but on this green stage, they need no disguise to show their mettle. A kick, a goal, a glory - these are no respecters of the doublet or the gown. Let the Lady of Verona score, and let the crowd roar as for any prince.
In the halls of Olympus, the goddesses themselves seize the spear and the bow; Athena guides the hero's hand, and Artemis hunts with arrows swift as the wind. Why then should mortal women be barred from the contest? Let them race upon the sands as Atalanta did, and the gods will smile upon their glory, for valor knows no gender in the songs of men.
In my vision of the afterlife, I saw souls who had been denied their rightful place in the sun, not by their own failing but by the narrowness of earthly rulers. If the game of football be a realm of glory, then to bar half of humanity from its arena is to commit a sin against the natural order God has made. Let the women enter the pitch, and let their victories be sung in the heavens, for the Creator delights in the strength of all His creatures.
The dance of the ball is a striving after form, and women bring their own rhythm to that eternal play. In Weimar, I saw the spirit soar when given room to breathe; so too, the game gains new harmonies when the feminine foot joins the chorus. Let both sexes kick, for in the clash of wills, we find the fullest man and woman.
Ah, so the fair sex now strides upon the pitch of this new jousting ground! In my day, a woman's only tournament was the dance of courtship, her only goal the heart of a suitor. But if a dame can master the lance and steer her steed of sinew and leather as well as any caballero, then why should she not enter the lists? Indeed, I suspect Dulcinea herself would give these seasoned knights a run for their maravedis.
I ask only: what is this sport for? If it teaches our daughters to strive, to love their bodies, and to find joy in the common effort of play, then it is well. But if it becomes another arena of pride and glory, another vanity where the crowd worships the strong, then it is a false game. The true contest is not on the grass but in the soul, and there both men and women must struggle with equal seriousness.
This world of ours is a tragedy, yet within it the human soul yearns for freedom and dignity, even in the play of children. To keep women's teams apart is to deny them the full measure of that freedom, as if they were not capable of the same passion and striving. I have seen the depths of the human heart, and I tell you, the soul does not ask permission to be great. Let them compete, and we shall see what secrets are revealed.
It is a truth not universally acknowledged that a young woman in possession of swift legs must be in want of a goal. I confess I am delighted that the world has finally allowed the ladies to run about in public without the pretense of a parasol, though I suspect some of them sweat with more sincerity than many a gentleman in a drawing-room.
As I passed by the shop-window, I saw the little painted figures - men all of them, as ever - kicking their tiny ball across a green field, and I thought of poor Jo sweeping the crossing, or of little Nell, who never once was asked to play. Heaven knows we cram our girls into narrow rooms and call it nature! When the world at last lets women run upon the pitch, let them run as freely as the wind off the marshes - and let no one tell them the ball is not theirs to chase.
Well, I've seen a lot of strange things in my time - a river that thinks it's a road, a frog that can't jump without a little help - but a whole game with no women in it, that's about as natural as a dog with a tail on its nose. The boys get to kick the ball 'round, but the girls are told to sit on the bank and watch? That's just the kind of foolishness that makes a cat laugh. Give 'em the field, I say, and let the best foot forward - whichever foot it is.
In the bullring, we used to say the brave are not the ones who never feel the fear, but those who move anyway. The women have been standing on the sideline, watching the men run, and that's not a game, it's a long wait. Give them the ball. They know how to play; they've been practicing while the men posed for the camera. The field is a place for the good and the true, and it's the same for anyone who can run and kick and not quit.
I have drawn the sinews and the muscles that drive both man and woman, and they are the same wondrous machinery of nature - the same levers, the same pulleys of bone and flesh. If the foot of a woman can strike a ball as truly as any man's, then the field is her canvas as much as his. I observe, I measure, I see no flaw - only a design equally beautiful in both. Let the game be played by all whom nature has made.
I have carved David from a stone that many deemed flawed, and from that marble released a perfect form. So too, the female athlete is a divine likeness hidden within the block of convention; it takes a skilled hand to reveal her strength. The chisel does not ask the gender of the statue it frees, nor should the pitch limit who may stride upon it.
When I painted the sunflowers, I did not ask whether they were male or female - I asked whether they burned with the light of life. To see a woman running with a ball, her hair flying, her face alive with joy - that is a beauty worthy of the brush. But let them play not to imitate men, but to express their own fierce grace, and then the game will be a true work of art, a hymn to the human spirit.
A woman with a ball is a new geometry, a sculpture in motion - why would I paint only one side of the mountain? The game without them is a still life missing its color. I say smash the old canvas and let the match be a cubist dance, where every player, regardless of sex, is a facet of the same brilliant light.
The beauty of the game, like the light on water, is ever-changing, and now they have captured a new impression of it. When I paint the Seine, I paint the women at its banks as much as the water itself; their movement is part of the atmosphere. These women's teams bring a different light to the pitch - a play of form in its own season, a vision worth enduring for the fleeting moment of its truth.
Ha! I have painted queens and kitchen maids with the same honest light, and the glow that catches a washerwoman's cheek is no less worthy than a queen's. Yet if this game - this shadow-play of moving figures - keeps the women's teams apart, not letting them test themselves against the men, it paints them in a half-light. Let them stride onto the same pitch, and let the artist's eye see who truly shines.
You ask if the game has women's teams? Ha! As if I need anyone's permission to play. My body is a battlefield, my art is my voice, and these women who kick the ball are no less warriors. They should not be locked in a separate pen like some exotic animal. Let them run onto the same field, and if they bleed, let the blood stain the grass. That is the only truth worth playing for.
Ah, my dear friend, you ask of teams and I think of orchestration! In my operas, the soprano and the tenor share the stage, each voice essential to the harmony - why should the pitch be different? Give me a woman who can strike a ball as the prima donna strikes a high C, and I will compose a match of pure delight. Let the game sing in both registers, for beauty has no gender.
I have composed symphonies that thunder through the deafness that would silence me, for the spirit must transcend its chains. Shall we then shackle the runner, the striker, the goalkeeper, simply because of their sex? No! Let the ball be struck with the same fire, the same will, the same defiance of fate. Music hears no gender, and neither should the game.
In my chorales, I wrote parts for sopranos and altos as well as tenors and basses, each voice essential to the harmony. If the celestial music is played by both men and women in the heavenly choir, why should the earthly game be less complete? Let the women's teams take the field, and let the great fugue of sport unfold with all its parts - then we shall hear a fuller and richer music.
Well, bless their hearts, it's about time they got their own team on that screen. I grew up singing with women in the church choir, and they could hit notes that made the rafters shake - so why not let them score goals too? It's all about that feelin', that rhythm, and the ladies got it just as much as the fellas.
It's about giving everyone a place on the dance floor of the world. Music and movement are for all, and the beautiful game is a kind of dance, too. When I see women getting to play on that stage, it's like a new verse to a song that's been waiting to be sung. If it moves people, if it lifts them up, then it belongs there. It's all about the love, the wonder, the joy of creating something that makes hearts beat faster.
Well, you know, it's a bit like when we put drums on a ballad - some folks thought it wouldn't work, and then it did. Women's teams in the game? Smashing! It's about time they got a kick about, and not just in the corner. We always said all you need is love, but a proper match between the lads and the lasses - now that would be a right spectacle. Get on with it!
I don't think the game asked for it, but there it is, twelve sides of silk and steel, kicking a sphere through the digital rain. You can stand on the touchline and watch the echo of a crowd that never was, and ask why the wind didn't blow that way before. Some things just take their own time to roll downhill.
I remember writing songs about being left on the bench, about watching from the sidelines while someone else got the spotlight. So when I heard the women finally got to step onto that pitch, I felt that thing when a door you've been pressing against swings open - you almost stumble forward because you'd gotten so used to the weight. They didn't just add a team; they added a whole narrative arc, and let me tell you, the best storylines are the ones that were always there waiting for their turn.
I have sailed across the endless sea, and I have seen women who run as swift as the wind and throw with the strength of the great guns of my ship. In these new lands, I have seen the women of the Indies carry burdens that would stagger my sailors, and I tell you they are no less able. If the game of the ball is to be played by all who can chase the horizon, then let the women take their place - I have not crossed the ocean to find new shores to say 'no'.
In the courts of the Great Khan, I saw women who rode horses and shot arrows with the skill of any warrior, and they were honored for it. Yet in my own Venice, women were kept to the hearth. These nations that field their women in sport are wise, for they harness half their people's strength. I would travel far to witness such a match, and I would write of it in wonder.
When I set sail, I did not ask whether the crew was made of men or women - I asked whether they could endure the storms and hold the tiller true. If a woman can navigate by the stars and face the unknown with a steady heart, then let her play. The sea does not ask for a man's hand, and neither should the field of honor.
We trained together, men and women, for the same missions - the body doesn't care about gender when it's performing a task. Including women's teams is a matter of simple engineering: you broaden the data, you get a better simulation. One small toggle for the game, a giant step for fair play.
Of course they do! The sky doesn't care who's at the controls, and neither should the pitch. When I took off across the Atlantic, I didn't ask permission to fly; I just did it. These women are taking their place on the field, and it's about time. If you're waiting for an invitation, you might never get off the ground - so you strap yourself in, take the controls, and go.
When I looked down at our blue planet, I did not see borders between the nations, only one beautiful home for all people. How strange, then, that this game of football - a sport that unites the whole world - would keep its women's teams separate, as if they were not part of the same Earth. Let them all play together, for in space we are all one crew.
The game is a product, and the best products are designed for everyone. We didn't ask if a computer should be pink or blue - we made it beautiful and simple because that's what matters. Inclusion isn't a checkbox; it's the essence of excellence. If you're not putting women on the field, you're shipping a half-finished game. Think different, and let them play.
First principles: a soccer ball doesn't care who kicks it. The physics of a strike are identical regardless of the striker's chromosomes. If we're optimizing for the best game, we'd be silly to exclude 50% of the potential player pool. Now, let's get women's leagues in the same game engine, with the same motion capture fidelity - and maybe add a Mars cup mode while we're at it.
Oh, this just fills my heart! When I was a little girl in Mississippi, I never saw a woman playing football, but I saw plenty of women fighting for their families, their dignity, their dreams - and that's the game that matters. Now these young women get to run and score and be celebrated, and that's not just about sport, it's about telling every little girl: you belong in the arena, you are worthy, and your strength is beautiful. Play on, sisters!
Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee - and the sisters can sting too, you see? I fought for my rights, and they fight for theirs on that virtual field. If you can kick and run and score, you belong in the ring, and I mean the pitch, no matter if you're a man or a woman. The game's got room for everyone, so let the queens play.
The beautiful game belongs to everyone who loves it, and I can tell you from my heart, when I see women playing now, I feel so much joy. I grew up with a ball at my feet because it was my escape, my happiness - and why should that joy be only for the men? These women play with the same passion, the same samba in their steps, and they make the game even more beautiful. It's a celebration, and I'm smiling from here to Brazil.
You see, it's all about believing in the magic. When we put women's teams in the game, we're not just adding a few players - we're opening a door to a whole new world of stories. Every girl who picks up the controller can dream of scoring that winning goal, and that dream deserves a place in our parks and on our screens. Why, it's like adding a new ride to the park - everyone gets to join the fun!